Read Source A first for chronology and context, then Source B for tone. Underline key words in Source B. Use the passages to answer each question. Optional: open Sources for more reading.
Source A — Reading passage
On the northern Prairies in the 1870s and 1880s, life was changing with painful speed. Buffalo herds that had supported Plains nations for generations were collapsing. Families depended more on promised rations and trade goods from the Crown—yet deliveries did not always arrive when needed, and hunger sharpened every political argument.
At Treaty Six talks in 1876, Poundmaker pressed negotiators through interpreters. He wanted treaties to mean real help when game failed, and he wanted the words on paper to match what Indigenous signers understood they were promising, not empty phrases while people went hungry.
Sources often describe his parentage as Stony Nakoda, Cree, and Blackfoot; the alliances he moved in crossed many kin and council ties. In English newspapers and Indian Affairs files he appears as ‘Poundmaker,’ but in his own communities he was remembered as a head chief who could calm a divided lodge and speak with precision when young men demanded quick action.
In the spring of 1885, reports of fighting farther east at places such as Duck Lake reached Battleford. Fear grew because settlers and police expected attacks, while Cree and Assiniboine families expected punishment and further ration cuts if officials treated every camp as rebellion. Near Fort Battleford, settlers and North-West Mounted Police crowded inside the wooden palisade. Outside, thousands of Cree and Assiniboine people camped in the windy open prairie−short on meat and flour, watched by people quick to read any large gathering as a threat. Shortage and humiliation touched both sides of the timber, even as stories of blame emerged.
West of Battleford, Poundmaker's camp lay near Cut Knife Creek. In Cree tradition the war chief leads fighters in combat; the head chief carries the wider political judgment of the people. At Cut Knife the war chief was Fine Day. Poundmaker held the weight of deciding when to fight, when to hold back, and how to protect non-combatants.
Before dawn on May 2nd, 1885, a flying column of Canadian militia and police under Lieutenant-Colonel William Otter moved against Poundmaker's sleeping camp. Fine Day’s fighters used ground and brush to turn the attack; Otter’s column broke off and withdrew. Many accounts say warriors then wanted to ride down the retreating force. Poundmaker is widely credited with blocking that pursuit— choosing restraint after a defensive victory when revenge would have been easy.
Canada’s response went from military defeat to criminal process. After fighting ended farther east on May 26th, 1885, Poundmaker surrendered to Major-General Middleton at Battleford, hoping—he said—to protect his hungry people in the eyes of the law. In Regina he was tried for treason-felony, convicted, and sentenced to three years at Stony Mountain Penitentiary in Manitoba. Poor health, political pressure, and concern from leaders such as his adopted father Crowfoot of the Blackfoot nation contributed to an early release. He died on July 4th, 1886, soon after leaving prison, still a young man.
Historians still debate looting, who gave orders, and who threatened whom around Battleford. What many sources agree on is that starvation policy, treaty stress, and colonial courts shaped the crisis as much as any single battle. In 2019 the Government of Canada formally exonerated Poundmaker and acknowledged injustice in his conviction. Communities continue to honour him as a leader who tried to limit killing and keep people alive.
Source B — Document-style excerpt
Government counsel described the accused as a rebellious chief who led an uprising against lawful authority. Witnesses for the Crown framed gatherings near Battleford as intimidation. The defence replied that starving people had assembled to seek food and justice, not to overthrow the Queen. Judges and juries heard these competing stories in a courtroom built on colonial law. Whatever the verdict, Indigenous listeners understood that the same system controlled rations, police, and land.